I really don't think he understands ruby web servers well... Using Puma on MRI is silly. You get none of the threading gains it was designed for. It needs to ru

I really don't think he understands ruby web servers well... Using Puma on MRI is silly. You get none of the threading gains it was designed for. It needs to run in jruby or rubinius for it to be mildly accurate. Also, Puma ain't the fastest ruby web server. I'd like to see this same test run using Thin 2.0 (though it'll make you cry-- or so they say), Unicorn, or Rainbows. As well, as others have said, comparing a large framework to one without is silly. I'm not hating on go or saying rails is fast, I just feel like this is a particularly bad demonstration of the authors point. This is more of a correlation, than causation. Too many factors not accounted for, or mentioned, which obviously contribute to the results.