5 ms·
You'd have to prove that it was you talking on the phone. You'd need a recording of the conversation for the judge to be sure.
by chris_mahan 13y ago
You'd have to prove that it was you talking on the phone. You'd need a recording of the conversation for the judge to be sure.
- khuey 13y agoReasonable doubt.
- genwin 13y agoPresumably the NSA knows his location during the bank robbery, via his cell phone data. He needn't have been talking on the phone at the time. If his location was miles away then he should be off the hook.
- taftster 13y agoAssuming he didn't leave it with his cousin Cletus who placed the phone call instead. NSA metadata does not help the accused in any way.
- genwin 13y agoIt would be a piece of evidence to counter the prosecution's evidence against him. If his DNA is on the money, it won't help much. But if the prosecution has no hard evidence, it could form reasonable doubt of guilt.