4 ms·
For a little bit of fairness, shouldn't he at least be comparing Sinatra, not Rails? And where's the source code so we can compare the other part of this: devel
by timdorr 13y ago
For a little bit of fairness, shouldn't he at least be comparing Sinatra, not Rails? And where's the source code so we can compare the other part of this: developer effort.
- arkitaip 13y agoWhy? This is about changing production code for better performance, not being "fair" to Ruby.
- bhauer 13y agoHe links to a filtered view of our results which also includes Sinatra [1]. I can't provide his source code, but you can review the source code of the Go [2] and Sinatra [3] implementations for our project at GitHub. Note that the Go test implements all of our current tests; the Sinatra code only implements the JSON-serialization and database query tests. [1] http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r5&p=3q http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r5&p=3q [2] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/master/go/src/hello/hello.go https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast... [3] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/master/sinatra/hello_world.rb https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...