3 ms·
The article is from 1998, Java was 3 years old.
by jrbedard 17y ago
The article is from 1998, Java was 3 years old.
- phatboyslim 17y agoDoes that also mean the statistics provided by the author are meaningless since they are 10 years old and closely tied to the dot-com boom?
- akeefer 17y agoSince they're backward looking statistics they actually track what happened before the dot com boom. They still might not be relevant given the current marketplace, of course.
- ironkeith 17y agoI appear to have made a date mistake. sigh