3 ms·

NY Times is pretty in touch with what's cool w/ the kids these days. Ie. "the new Java language".

• jrbedard 17y ago
  The article is from 1998, Java was 3 years old.
  • phatboyslim 17y ago
    Does that also mean the statistics provided by the author are meaningless since they are 10 years old and closely tied to the dot-com boom?
    • akeefer 17y ago
      Since they're backward looking statistics they actually track what happened before the dot com boom. They still might not be relevant given the current marketplace, of course.
  • ironkeith 17y ago
    I appear to have made a date mistake. sigh