5 ms·
And why bother splitting up large files when most clients can resume partial HTTP requests?
by tlrobinson 13y ago
And why bother splitting up large files when most clients can resume partial HTTP requests?
- raverbashing 13y agoWell... Fat32 FSs don't support files > 2GB But yeah, it's silly.
- rbanffy 13y agoSomehow, I imagine they are not hosting these off FAT32 filesystems. Maybe it's IIS that isn't very good with partial HTTP requests... ;-)
- mh- 13y agoFAT32 is common on portable storage (SD cards, USB 'thumb' drives), especially when cross-platform support is a concern.
- rbanffy 13y agoI understand that FAT32 has a role in portable storage. What I fail to understand is the relation between USB drives and serving VM images.
- mentat 13y agoSneakernet moving of files to non-network connected devices.
- rbanffy 13y agoAnd how common would that use case be when we are talking about virtual machines used in web development?
- raverbashing 13y agoVery common Copying a 4GB file through a congested wi-fi connection may be very slow It's easier and faster to copy to a good USB drive
- warfangle 13y agoOr, uh, use cat6.