4 ms·
I am a biologist (who regularly sequences cDNA), and it is properly understood to mean complementary DNA. In fact, the syllabus' description of the process is f
by rflrob 13y ago
I am a biologist (who regularly sequences cDNA), and it is properly understood to mean complementary DNA. In fact, the syllabus' description of the process is far enough from what the process of actually making cDNA is like that it seems to me there could be grounds for a challenge, even though as others have noted, cDNA is no longer widely used for these kinds of diagnostics.
- michaelhoffman 13y agoThe syllabus is not part of the decision and has no legal effect (it says this at the top of every syllabus), so wouldn't be grounds for a challenge. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Detroit_Timber_%26_Lumber_Company http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Detroit_Timber...