3 ms·
Duely noted, but I don't think it ought to make a difference in the price tag unless the CMS was doing conversion and distribution.
by true_religion 13y ago
Duely noted, but I don't think it ought to make a difference in the price tag unless the CMS was doing conversion and distribution.
- untog 13y ago...which it was. One of the big features was the ability to edit video in a lower bitrate (i.e. faster to work with) then send it off to a server to process on the full HD video. Great idea, but apparently it was a total mess to work with.
- archivator 13y agoIIRC, their CMS was supposed to be the Holy Grail of video management. Centralized and decentralized storage, processing farms, search-by-image, advanced tagging, etc. Sounded quite impressive but from what I understand, there are now commercial solutions that have some of those feature sets. The way they explain it, when they started no one had these features.