After reading and digesting rayiner's (and others') points elsewhere on this thread I realize the most likely approach the prosecution would take is to assert (

After reading and digesting rayiner's (and others') points elsewhere on this thread I realize the most likely approach the prosecution would take is to assert (c): c) "You have signaled that you received an NSL and are therefore in violation. It's your own damn fault you were forced to choose between lying and breaking the law"