5 ms·
Agreed. We need a "catch-22" amendment, explicitly forbidding secret laws.
by mokus 13y ago
Agreed. We need a "catch-22" amendment, explicitly forbidding secret laws.
- leoc 13y agoThe amendment should of course be a secret. :)
- taeric 13y agoI would say it should be formulated as such: The only way to make a secret law is to have everyone agree on the merits for keeping the law secret.
- toufka 13y agoIt'd be perfect. It would have been instigated by the fall of one character, name 'Snowden'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yossarian#Snowden http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yossarian#Snowden
- warmwaffles 13y agoI completely forgot about Snowden in Catch-22, weird that Edward Snowden and the fictional character share the same name...unless that was intentional.
- Vivtek 13y agoHe chose his own name intentionally? Or a time traveler visited Joseph Heller?