5 ms·
It is just a figure of speech, don't be pedantic about this.
by betterunix 13y ago
It is just a figure of speech, don't be pedantic about this.
- gnaritas 13y agoYour rights come from God is not a figure of speech; it's a statement of belief in God and it's not pedantic to point this out.
- betterunix 13y agoNo, it is a figure of speech and it is pedantic to claim that it is about belief in any deity. It is similarly used in this context: "God gave you legs, now move your ass out of my way!" It is nothing more than a way to express the idea that rights are something people are born with, regardless of who is in power or what sort of government rules over them. That is how the founding fathers (another figure of speech, nobody is claiming that any of those men are any living person's father) used the term.
- gnaritas 13y agoYou're absurd.
- yen223 13y agoIt's not pedantic. One of the most notable aspects of the US constitution is that its power is explicitly derived from the masses - "We the people..." - and not from some divine power, unlike the British monarchy.
- betterunix 13y agoPower is derived from the people, not rights. An early argument was over the very need for an explicit bill of rights. Even the text of the bill of rights suggests that the founders believed that certain rights are inherent: Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech... That wording seems to just assume that people have the right to speak freely, that no law is needed to give people that right, and that laws can only restrict that right (and such laws are explicitly forbidden). The phrase "God-given rights" is not meant to assert that God exists, it is meant to assert that certain rights transcend legal codes and exist regardless of what government happens to be in power (or even if there is a government in power).