4 ms·
A filesystem engineer/professor at a top-tier university told me once (well he told a whole class of us) that hierarchy is the only mechanism that the human br
by Nelson69 13y ago
A filesystem engineer/professor at a top-tier university told me once (well he told a whole class of us) that hierarchy is the only mechanism that the human brain has for dealing with complexity. A few people balked, they don't like 'trees' or what have you but nobody could come up with an alternative. This was nearly 20 years ago and I still haven't heard of a better idea.
So what's a filesystem? It's a very good and very scalable data structure for storing lot's of items. It's pretty good at lot's of little things and big things a like and a bunch of sizes in between. This problem remains.
Then be it tags, folders, something else, it's all just hierarchy to find and store your stuff in that data structure.. Where it looks like everything is going is having multiple overlay hierarchies, all your songs are in the music folder but then you tag different things to help you sort it out. Then maybe the computer can figure out some more optimal ways to store stuff. Take those fancy hybrid drives, maybe songs you don't play too often, there is no reason they can't be in part of the filesystem that is on spinning media and not in flash.
- lesedilino 13y ago>hierarchy is the only mechanism that the human brain has for dealing with complexity. A few people balked, they don't like 'trees' or what have you but nobody could come up with an alternative. None of you could think of anything better because you're engineers, not psychologists or philosophers. The "human brain" deals with complexity through: * causation * hierarchy * chunking * association * ordering Complexity in general is managed using all the tools of analysis: * drawing distinctions * drawing similarities * making definitions * transforming concepts using other concepts And this is all off the top of my head. It's been years since I took psychology of memory and philosophy of mind. But suffice to say your "top engineer" commenting on stuff outside his specialty and using the stupidity of undergrads to bolster his amateur argument is not convincing and is a pure expression of bathos.