3 ms·
In the end it's not the frequencies nor number of cores but performance per watt that matters. Most computers run on batteries these days, and those that don't
by yason 13y ago
In the end it's not the frequencies nor number of cores but performance per watt that matters.
Most computers run on batteries these days, and those that don't drain ever more expensive electricity from the wall socket and at the same time waste a lot of it producing huge amounts of heat.
The more you get out of a watt the better. You can either trade in speed for lower power or trade in power for better performance, but in either case you want the performance/watt ratio to be the highest.
I would guess the power consumption of running the chip at 5GHz is pretty high. And running temperatures as well. And yet there are fewer and fewer of those huge tasks that you can only do with one core.
- makomk 13y agoProbably, though it's hard to get a good grasp on actual power efficiency because Intel fudge their power figures so much these days...
- sliverstorm 13y agoIn the end it's not the frequencies nor number of cores but performance per watt that matters. It depends on the workload, really. It should already be obvious that this part is not meant to be a Joe Everyman processor.