2 ms·
Wow, he's turning into a crackpot: long, rambling articles with no introduction or conclusions that have no math or results to speak of, furtive mentions of how
by henning 19y ago
Wow, he's turning into a crackpot: long, rambling articles with no introduction or conclusions that have no math or results to speak of, furtive mentions of how the rest of the physics community can't grasp how brilliant and far-out his remarkable work is (which could be because he doesn't publish, doesn't collaborate, doesn't go to conferences, and basically doesn't actually participate in the research community).
- puppetsock 19y agoJohn Baez has developed an index for quantitatively judging revolutionary discoveries in physics: http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html Doesn't look like Wolfram scores very high on Baez's index, although Wolfram does get the 50 point item.
- Kaizyn 19y agoHe gets the 30 point question #30 too.