4 ms·
As a non-biologist, the comparison with cross-breeding does not seem reasonable to me. With cross-breeding, I can get characteristic A from some corn, characte
by CJefferson 13y ago
As a non-biologist, the comparison with cross-breeding does not seem reasonable to me.
With cross-breeding, I can get characteristic A from some corn, characteristic B from some other corn, and end up with corn with A+B. And also maybe over time taller, or larger.
With GM, I can do a much larger range of things taking genes from fish and putting them in corn (for example), which we currently poorly understand. The kinds of things we would like to do (make plants which grow fast and are hard to kill) seem like exactly the kinds of things that might lead to serious issues (we make a plant which we lose control of, grows fast, and is hard to kill).
- polyfractal 13y agoCross-breeding is fine, inbreeding is not. When you identify A+B makes a taller plant, you start breeding the children C with each other to isolate the "tall" gene. Soon you are inbreeding the descendent's of A+B. Most "breeds" of dogs are horribly inbred so that they maintain their traits. Same goes for "heritage" vegetables, "fancy" rats, or any other organism that humans have selectively cultivated.