3 ms·
Ironic? Not in the least. Even if he only mildly knew about the things he described he has an understanding of the points of tap the state actors have free acce
by windexh8er 13y ago
Ironic? Not in the least. Even if he only mildly knew about the things he described he has an understanding of the points of tap the state actors have free access to. In all generalities hiding from the NSA should be trivial with simple precautions (as it pertains to the Internet). Part of the problem is that those points of access are generally revered as daily can't-live-withouts and present trivial access and collection easement. The more interesting point will likely be that they don't find him - and then generalizations can be made about the efficacy of the NSA without their crutch. Good old 'Catch Me if You Can'?
TL;DR
Just because it's the NSA doesn't mean you can't beat them at what they do. There's always someone in the room smarter than yourself.
- michaelwww 13y agoYou don't understand irony. Many people don't (Alanis Morissette.) If my house burns down, that's unfortunate. If I install a fire detection system in my house and through a fault in itself it burns my house down, that's ironic.
- windexh8er 13y agoReally? It's not ironic because it's obvious - just not to you apparently. So in that regard it's not ironic that you misunderstood the response. -- an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
- michaelwww 13y agoI see you're point but mine's funnier. It's ok to take a little license in humor. You sucked all the funny out of it.