Not to put words in his mouth, but I think tptacek is referring to how credulous this site can become when it's something they feel passionate about. You said t

Not to put words in his mouth, but I think tptacek is referring to how credulous this site can become when it's something they feel passionate about. You said that the credibility of the petitioner here "could not be called into question" when it quite obviously can. You were just one example of this trait, but you were the highest rated one. Also, there's this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity#Federal_sovereign_immunity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity#Federal_sov...), which should immediately occur to anyone who follows legal stuff in even the most passing fashion. Generally speaking, you can't sue the President over anything related to his work.