4 ms·
[EDIT: OK, it appears that Wikipedia is more charitable than other sites in choosing with of Klayman's efforts to highlight. Mea culpa.] Klayman is severely pa
by gohrt 13y ago
[EDIT: OK, it appears that Wikipedia is more charitable than other sites in choosing with of Klayman's efforts to highlight. Mea culpa.]
Klayman is severely partisan, for sure, but is there any evidence that he deals in falsehoods?
Yes, sadly, the most energetic fighters are fighting one one side, instead of justice in generally.
But I'd rather have Klayman attacking Democrats for legitimate gripes, and Larry Flynt attacking Republicans for legitimate gripes, than practically getting nothing done because EFF is too boring to get support and non-partisans never get enough influence in general.
- tptacek 13y ago"In April 2011, Klayman filed a lawsuit against Facebook, accusing the social media website of "negligence" for not responding quickly enough to calls to take down an anti-Israel "Third Intifada" page and demanding $1 billion in damages."
- rpgmaker 13y agoThe EFF is not boring. You're very mistaken.
- dnautics 13y agoimmaterial. He said "too boring to get support". Presumably he meant "too boring to get [across the board] support [from citizens of all walks in the nation]". I say this, as a supporter of the EFF.