4 ms·
Another (or complementing) implementation of that idea is the FreedomBox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreedomBox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreedomBox
by vog 13y ago
Another (or complementing) implementation of that idea is the FreedomBox:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreedomBox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreedomBox
- Lerc 13y agoCertainly complimenting. By definition communication requires more than one person accessing information. I know what I'd like to see in this area, but I don't have a good idea how to implement it. FreedomBox might be heading towards that implementation. The idea I'm kicking around in my head for comms is something where I'd want a distributed data store (possibly just a file system) with access controls to enable requests such as "UserA acting on behalf of UserB would like to read data at /path/to/data". Where UserA might be twitter and UserB might be StephenFry. UserB can control what UserA can see and manipulate. UserA can do things that UserB cannot (such as acting on behalf of UserC)
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]