Is there more of a the back story that is not in the article? The way the article reads the case was "jeopardized" by the officer's lack of credibility on the s

Is there more of a the back story that is not in the article? The way the article reads the case was "jeopardized" by the officer's lack of credibility on the stand and the fact that the defense attorney was familiar with her from a previous case: But that case, like this one, was dropped because of evidence problems. ... "Her testimony on this was horrible, it was all contradictory," defense attorney Warren A. Brown said yesterday, referring to the Forrest case. He ticked off a list of what he said were conflicting statements, including the number of times McKissick discharged her weapon. Brown represented the 2005 suspect as well as the 45-year-old Forrest and says both cases involved inconsistent statements by McKissick.