4 ms·
The new is definitely an improvement, but both load fairly slowly - I would try improve this next, or at least allow staged loading so visitors have something t
by SeanDav 13y ago
The new is definitely an improvement, but both load fairly slowly - I would try improve this next, or at least allow staged loading so visitors have something to start looking at quickly while the rest loads.
- SMrF 13y agoThis is surprising. It's just HTML on S3 with cloudflare in front. Maybe Typekit is slowing it down...
- SeanDav 13y agoIt may just be my own setup but to me it seemed slower to load than many other sites I visit.
- tocomment 13y agoProbably a dumb question, what is the benefit from using Cloudflare? If I naively set up a page like this I would have just done S3 directly, right?
- general_failure 13y agocloudfare will cache your content in much much more locations across the globe unlike plain s3. (cloudfront from amazon does the same thing)
- beznogim 13y agoLoads fine for me even on mobile, but then I get http://i.imgur.com/JpxvAOz.jpg http://i.imgur.com/JpxvAOz.jpg when I try to sign up (iOS, Safari).
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- citizens 13y agoFor what it's worth it loads quickly for me (1/3 second). East coast US.