2 ms·

I found an article that claims a new technology could allow 10TB/in^2. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121010083826.htm http://www.sciencedaily.co

by AUmrysh 13y ago

I found an article that claims a new technology could allow 10TB/in^2. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121010083826.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121010083826.ht... With that, it would only require 1.639*10^6 cubic meters.

Einherji 13y ago
Key word there being "only". Still a pretty damn large and expensive facility. The fact that they most likely will have some sort of redundancy notwithstanding.
Keyframe 13y ago
For reference, wolframalhpa says that is approx. equivalent to 3.3x the volume this can carry (in oil): http://i.imgur.com/jSzgKAB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/jSzgKAB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/dVXdESI.jpg http://i.imgur.com/dVXdESI.jpg So, roughly four of those.