3 ms·
What? It's easier to find inbred retards who want to shoot at "the Man" than actually maintaining an educated populace, so therefore we "cherish" the 2a? That
by reader5000 13y ago
What? It's easier to find inbred retards who want to shoot at "the Man" than actually maintaining an educated populace, so therefore we "cherish" the 2a?
That is quite a novel interpretation of the 2a.
- gohrt 13y agoNo, parent was saying that it easier for an educated subset of the populace to shoot at the Man than to educate her "inbred, retard" (to use your phrase) peers. Exhibit A: the American Revolution.
- angersock 13y agoErm, again, not quite. I am suggesting that while the 1st and 4th amendments are very important, they alone are insufficient against jackbooted thugs; moreover, they appeal and are useful only to the relative intellectual elite of a country--if them. The 2nd amendment, by contrast, expands the availability of force to the common man, and in so doing allows even the dullest and slowest hooligan to contribute to the process of political reform. Indeed, should the Man come calling, I would rather have a dozen armed rednecks and coon-asses standing with me than a few score of the best-spoken orators of our time. It's unfortunate that things seem to be suggesting that this sort of calculus is becoming reasonable again.
- reader5000 13y agoHey man, there's a jack-booted thug right behind you!!