3 ms·
Initial trust is always free. Candidates all compete for this initial implicitly transacted form of confidence. Then the electing public play the wait & see g
by ak39 13y ago
Initial trust is always free. Candidates all compete for this initial implicitly transacted form of confidence. Then the electing public play the wait & see game. If the incumbent reneges on the promise, trust is understood to be broken, they vote someone else or soon enough become cynical of the entire system.
This system is bullshit. Promises made without accountability is the problem.
I think campaign promises should be made, but they should be made clearly with details of outcomes, timelines and plan Bs. Candidates can then compete on those detailed manifestos.
- saraid216 13y ago> This system is bullshit. Of course it is. It's bullshit because you have no responsibility in it. You've abdicated your democratic capabilities by saying, "Promise me the world, and I'll wait and watch to see if you give it to me." You're just a face in the audience. Why would anyone give a shit about being accountable to you?