6 ms·
I think the Swedish wiretapping is wrong and that the law should be torn up. That said, in practice it's less intrusive than the recently revealed US wiretappi
by sandstrom 13y ago
I think the Swedish wiretapping is wrong and that the law should be torn up.
That said, in practice it's less intrusive than the recently revealed US wiretapping-programs. Since more or less all software encrypt their traffic, the FRA-wiretapping is pretty useless.
- mehwoot 13y agoSince more or less all software encrypt their traffic, the FRA-wiretapping is pretty useless. Huh? Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but are you saying everybody uses SSL?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- fekberg 13y ago> Since more or less all software encrypt their traffic I suggest that you open Wireshark and start browsing the internet and use your applications that you normally do, then check the packages sent from/to the servers. If you think that "more or less all software" encrypts their data, you'll be really surprised what the dumps will show you.
- callesgg 13y ago"Since more or less all software encrypt their traffic." Just not true. However dosn't matter in the context of the fra law as it only allows meta data to be taped like somthing like. { from:'145.23.45.34:89047', to:'214.56.4.67:443', size:23456, when:'June 9 2013 12:34 13.234' }