3 ms·
I doubt the OP was calling him a terrorist, just saying (perhaps jokingly) that it's possible that's how the government will try to portray him. Did you see th
by tlrobinson 13y ago
I doubt the OP was calling him a terrorist, just saying (perhaps jokingly) that it's possible that's how the government will try to portray him.
Did you see the article titled "How three pacifists were convicted as terrorists" currently on the front page of HN? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5848148 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5848148
- u2328 13y agoMy statement stands. If he/she was being tongue-in-cheek, then it doesn't apply. If it's the powers-that-be that do it, well, there you are.
- dale386 13y agoYes, that's exactly what I was going for.
- u2328 13y agoWell, my apologies if I insulted you personally. It was meant to be an attack on the notation that this can be framed as 'terrorism'.