3 ms·
No reason, but PRISM as explained in #1 doesn't seem like that big of a deal, or at least, not that much more shocking then what we already knew.
by lawdawg 13y ago
No reason, but PRISM as explained in #1 doesn't seem like that big of a deal, or at least, not that much more shocking then what we already knew.
- mortehu 13y agoAs far as I can see, this debacle is entirely the fault of one journalist at The Washington Post, and the people who believed his interpretation of some aspects of some PowerPoint slides. A lot of hot air was also generated by people who had forgotten about interception facilities like Room 641A, and thought it was news. </unsubstantiated-claims>
- vbo 13y agoPrevious instances of abuse don't legitimise abuse.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]