This is sort of off-topic, but it would be nice if there was a convenient way to know if a pundit is a complete buffoon - like a score based on how many correct

This is sort of off-topic, but it would be nice if there was a convenient way to know if a pundit is a complete buffoon - like a score based on how many correct or incorrect predictions he's made. Points off for saying Iraq would be a cakewalk and had nuclear weapons, and that houses in Las Vegas were a good investment in 2005. You could save a few minutes of your life and a few neurons by skipping articles by people who make those kinds of predictions. I have no idea who Mauldin is, or whether he can be expected to give a balanced view of an issue I don't know much about.