To make people realize the possible consequences of surveillance. If there is a consequence of surveillance that would make these people change their mind, the

To make people realize the possible consequences of surveillance. If there is a consequence of surveillance that would make these people change their mind, then publishing that information is hypocritical by somebody who thinks it is ethically wrong to expose information that a person might want to have kept secret. If there is no consequence, then the act is useless. If there is a consequence, then these people are using the precisely the mechanism that they argue is the reason we should have privacy. I wanted the person I was replying to spell this out so I could make the point clearly using their own words, without them getting hung up over how I phrased it.