> I can rebut Assange's points on their own merits, but I choose not to Yes. Instead, you chose an ad hominem attack, which is pretty much the definition of f

> I can rebut Assange's points on their own merits, but I choose not to Yes. Instead, you chose an ad hominem attack, which is pretty much the definition of feeding the trolls. > Is this ad hominem reasoning? Sure, but ad hominem reasoning isn't necessarily bad. No, ad hominem reasoning is simply meritless. The opposite of engaging in a discussion is remaining silent, not scoffing and walking off stage.