6 ms·

Apparently those people in the twitter feed are fine with getting registered and living under high transparency. My suggestion would be a crowd funded campaign

by stfu 13y ago

Apparently those people in the twitter feed are fine with getting registered and living under high transparency. My suggestion would be a crowd funded campaign to doxx each one of them. Would be happy to donate a few hours of my time tracing their real names. With some funded capital we could buy and publish for each one a personal background check sort of a personal gift to free them from the burden of anonymity.

wslh 13y ago
Apparently those people in the twitter feed are fine with getting registered and living under high transparency. I suggest the NSA to record them having sex to see how clean they are. Obviously the videos will be encryped so only intelligence agencies can watch them.
mehwoot 13y ago
An internet campaign by privacy advocates to shame those people who expressed an opinion. That's a great idea. You should totally do it. This won't backfire or be hypocritical in any way shape or form.
- stfu 13y ago
  I don't understand in how far this is an act of shaming. If I walk around the pool and tell people that I like to get thrown into the pool I expect somebody to throw me into the pool.
  - mehwoot 13y ago
    Each of those tweets I can see says "nothing to hide from the government". You are not the government. Secondly, the fact that you would stoop to doing exactly the sort of thing you oppose, because these people are on the other side of a debate, shows exactly the sort of thinking that creates these problems in the first place. Even if they explicitly asked for it, which they didn't, you still shouldn't do it if you believe it is a thing that shouldn't be done to people.
    - randallsquared 13y ago
      Even the staunchest privacy advocates don't use privacy to mean that people shouldn't be able to share their information with others, as far as I'm aware. Therefore, a privacy advocate searching for and publishing information about people who've explicitly given permission is certainly not doing anything that they believe "shouldn't be done to people".
      - mehwoot 13y ago
        Explain to me then what the purpose of collecting all the public data about these people and publishing it would be.
        zxcdw 13y ago
        Do you really not know, or do you just act dumb? To make people realize the possible consequences of surveillance. One of the assumptions is that the people aren't completely aware of the extent of surveillance. They assume it's simple as "someone listening to my phone call to my mom" or something as innocent. Something like that hardly has consequences for them, but something like piblishing their private information and data surely has. If they have nothing to hide, they should be all okay with this. If they aren't however... then they should not be supporting surveillance. What did I miss?
        mehwoot 13y ago
        To make people realize the possible consequences of surveillance. If there is a consequence of surveillance that would make these people change their mind, then publishing that information is hypocritical by somebody who thinks it is ethically wrong to expose information that a person might want to have kept secret. If there is no consequence, then the act is useless. If there is a consequence, then these people are using the precisely the mechanism that they argue is the reason we should have privacy. I wanted the person I was replying to spell this out so I could make the point clearly using their own words, without them getting hung up over how I phrased it.
        13y ago
  - johnchristopher 13y ago
    It's an analogy really close to "She's walking around in a slutty dress so she asked for it".
    - mpyne 13y ago
      If it's not exactly that same analogy it's only off by a micron. For that matter that is why I mentioned elsewhere that I'm less scared of the government than I am of my fellow hackers, when this is the mentality that is all too frequently employed. :-/
    - mrbombastic 13y ago
      Not even close, they literally asked for it out loud on twitter for all the world to see.
tripzilch 13y ago
DOXX THEM IN THE NAME OF PRIVACY! :-/ congratulations, you just stooped to the very same level of counter-productive-intelligence as those who are orchestrating the transparent monitoring of our society.
anonymfus 13y ago
Most frightening thing is that some of these people really don't have anything to hide. Just out of curiosity I went to the blog of one of the first mentioned twitter users (https://twitter.com/MeaniePants/status/342430468442042369 https://twitter.com/MeaniePants/status/342430468442042369 ) and found photos and stories about toilet training of her child. WTF. >I also think it's histerical that I put a pic of Lily pooping on Facebook and it received the most likes ever. I think even more than her birth photo or Roman's homecoming pics.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
- meowface 13y ago
  Fantastic job pulling their names from their Twitter profiles and putting them next to their Twitter usernames! I can't even imagine the amount of work that must've gone into such an effort.

by stfu 13y ago

wslh 13y ago

Apparently those people in the twitter feed are fine with getting registered and living under high transparency. I suggest the NSA to record them having sex to see how clean they are. Obviously the videos will be encryped so only intelligence agencies can watch them.

mehwoot 13y ago

An internet campaign by privacy advocates to shame those people who expressed an opinion. That's a great idea. You should totally do it. This won't backfire or be hypocritical in any way shape or form.

stfu 13y ago
I don't understand in how far this is an act of shaming. If I walk around the pool and tell people that I like to get thrown into the pool I expect somebody to throw me into the pool.
- mehwoot 13y ago
  Each of those tweets I can see says "nothing to hide from the government". You are not the government. Secondly, the fact that you would stoop to doing exactly the sort of thing you oppose, because these people are on the other side of a debate, shows exactly the sort of thinking that creates these problems in the first place. Even if they explicitly asked for it, which they didn't, you still shouldn't do it if you believe it is a thing that shouldn't be done to people.
  - randallsquared 13y ago
    Even the staunchest privacy advocates don't use privacy to mean that people shouldn't be able to share their information with others, as far as I'm aware. Therefore, a privacy advocate searching for and publishing information about people who've explicitly given permission is certainly not doing anything that they believe "shouldn't be done to people".
    - mehwoot 13y ago
      Explain to me then what the purpose of collecting all the public data about these people and publishing it would be.
      - zxcdw 13y ago
        Do you really not know, or do you just act dumb? To make people realize the possible consequences of surveillance. One of the assumptions is that the people aren't completely aware of the extent of surveillance. They assume it's simple as "someone listening to my phone call to my mom" or something as innocent. Something like that hardly has consequences for them, but something like piblishing their private information and data surely has. If they have nothing to hide, they should be all okay with this. If they aren't however... then they should not be supporting surveillance. What did I miss?
        mehwoot 13y ago
        To make people realize the possible consequences of surveillance. If there is a consequence of surveillance that would make these people change their mind, then publishing that information is hypocritical by somebody who thinks it is ethically wrong to expose information that a person might want to have kept secret. If there is no consequence, then the act is useless. If there is a consequence, then these people are using the precisely the mechanism that they argue is the reason we should have privacy. I wanted the person I was replying to spell this out so I could make the point clearly using their own words, without them getting hung up over how I phrased it.
        13y ago
- johnchristopher 13y ago
  It's an analogy really close to "She's walking around in a slutty dress so she asked for it".
  - mpyne 13y ago
    If it's not exactly that same analogy it's only off by a micron. For that matter that is why I mentioned elsewhere that I'm less scared of the government than I am of my fellow hackers, when this is the mentality that is all too frequently employed. :-/
  - mrbombastic 13y ago
    Not even close, they literally asked for it out loud on twitter for all the world to see.

tripzilch 13y ago

DOXX THEM IN THE NAME OF PRIVACY! :-/ congratulations, you just stooped to the very same level of counter-productive-intelligence as those who are orchestrating the transparent monitoring of our society.

anonymfus 13y ago

Most frightening thing is that some of these people really don't have anything to hide. Just out of curiosity I went to the blog of one of the first mentioned twitter users (https://twitter.com/MeaniePants/status/342430468442042369 https://twitter.com/MeaniePants/status/342430468442042369 ) and found photos and stories about toilet training of her child. WTF. >I also think it's histerical that I put a pic of Lily pooping on Facebook and it received the most likes ever. I think even more than her birth photo or Roman's homecoming pics.

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

meowface 13y ago
Fantastic job pulling their names from their Twitter profiles and putting them next to their Twitter usernames! I can't even imagine the amount of work that must've gone into such an effort.