3 ms·
"Japan's radiation disaster toll: none dead, none sick" http://www.theage.com.au/comment/japans-radiation-disaster-toll-none-dead-none-sick-20130604-2nomz.html
by CCs 13y ago
"Japan's radiation disaster toll: none dead, none sick"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/japans-radiation-disaster-toll-none-dead-none-sick-20130604-2nomz.html http://www.theage.com.au/comment/japans-radiation-disaster-t...
Contrast this with "The dam failures killed an estimated 171,000 people" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam_failure http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam_failure
- davvid 13y agoThat's one columnist's opinion, and it seems like he's just trumpeting the W.H.O.'s story. I don't think it's safe to call this book closed. There are other opinions, and facts. http://www.allgov.com/usa/ca/news/california-and-the-nation/study-suggests-fukushima-disaster-caused-thyroid-abnormalities-in-us-babies-130408?news=849668 http://www.allgov.com/usa/ca/news/california-and-the-nation/...
- CCs 13y agoRight now there's no cost-effective technology to create safe energy - just that some are worse than others http://www.energyjustice.net/coal http://www.energyjustice.net/coal