5 ms·

If the story was 100% correct then they wouldn't have to alter it, even if said companies were somehow forced to lie to the public. It would stand up on its own

If the story was 100% correct then they wouldn't have to alter it, even if said companies were somehow forced to lie to the public. It would stand up on its own merits.

mtgx 13y ago
It says right there in the slides PRISM has direct access to their servers. How the media and the public interpret that, that's different. Maybe if the government was more transparent, this wouldn't happen.
- res0nat0r 13y ago
  Or maybe the slides are inaccurate?
  - AnthonyMouse 13y ago
    Maybe. Hey, why don't we ask someone with first hand knowledge? ...
    - res0nat0r 13y ago
      We can't ask the person who supplied said info since they are anonymous, but you can ask Zuck or Larry since they've personally said the allegations are totally false, so there is that.
      - Terretta 13y ago
        Not remotely what they said.
  - dannyr 13y ago
    It can't be. It's on the internet so it must be true.