3 ms·
Yet you keep hanging on that they only mention "direct access" and how the denials are similar, it's not about what you believe to be true or not, it's about th
by rasterizer 13y ago
Yet you keep hanging on that they only mention "direct access" and how the denials are similar, it's not about what you believe to be true or not, it's about the things you say that aren't true - here is an example of a denial that does not only include "direct access" but all sorts of access as well.
- eksith 13y agoI don't want to start a flame war with you, but in lieu of repeating what others have already said to you regarding the "direct access" quote (I'm not "hanging on" btw, I have read the other reports as well), I'll just leave this here. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5836420 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5836420
- rasterizer 13y agoThe whole problem with PRISM is that the government potentially can tunnel into company servers and take what they like, and that is being disputed by the accused companies. I'm not sure what is rumored or not, or what is true or not. My point is that they deny involvement in PRISM, and by PRISM I mean the program that alleges access to company servers.