4 ms·
> you made that comment having absolutely no idea what my experience was I made the comment based on the fact that the only thing you ever talk about actually
by nknighthb 13y ago
> you made that comment having absolutely no idea what my experience was
I made the comment based on the fact that the only thing you ever talk about actually doing is security-related. On everything else, you just pontificate context-free.
You implied earlier I should have looked at your "public linkedin profile". You should know that, for me, your profile contains nothing but your current and past employers, and your university. Nothing about what you did there. What was I supposed to conclude from that?
I've spent most of my career working for companies that do video-related work, but if you ask me a question about MPEG transport streams, I'll refer you to the guy who, y'know, actually deals with MPEG.
At this point I am pissy, yes, but that's not because I was wrong, it's because of the asshole who decided he knows better what my personal time commitments are than I do.
> The thread is now full of technical commentary about the point I made.
No, it isn't. The thread is full of cursory rejections of your equally cursory commentary. There is absolutely nothing interesting about any of it, because it's all surface bullshit that everybody already knows. There are no details. There's nothing concrete. There's nothing new. Boring, hand-wavy crap.
Propose something concrete, something that actually addresses the obvious criticisms you already know are going to be leveled, and I might get interested.
Right now, all I'm interested in is ignoring HN for a while.
- tptacek 13y agoWell, just to be clear: you were pretty wrong about what I've "done". Have a good weekend. Ignoring HN can definitely be a healthy thing sometimes.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]