3 ms·
Honestly it could be as simple as a "Law Enforcement API", that's configured with a company-run interface to NSA. The NSA analyst gets intel on such-and-such a
by mpyne 13y ago
Honestly it could be as simple as a "Law Enforcement API", that's configured with a company-run interface to NSA.
The NSA analyst gets intel on such-and-such an account ID/phone number/email/etc., uses PRISM to send a request (probably something stupid like SOAP, it's the govt after all).
The company computer verifies a valid warrant ID, valid request type, "hoovers up" the data requested and spits it back to NSA.
Technically not direct access. Certainly not a direct wiretap into the entire company database. But NSA is able to get the "special source data" they need for correlation on their end (possibly using tools as provided by Palantir).
They figure out whatever network of conspirators they're researching, develop "actionable intel", good guys win (note: depends on your interpretation of good guys, obviously :P).
Zuck and Page are still right in this scenario. I just wish someone would speak up about what the hell is actually going on!
- cpleppert 13y agoI think that you are broadly right. The government can already get access to Google, facebook etc so PRISM could be just a friendlier user interface around the whole process. So instead of: 1)investigate 2) get warrant 3) send warrant to companies with data request 4)companies send data back 5) repeat 3-4 until investigation complete PRISM allows an analyst to load up a warrant and start exploring data immediately without having to wait for the company to verify it and then do a ETL operation back to the NSA.