4 ms·
I don't think so. Those usually sound like, "We cannot confirm or deny the existence of such a program," or "It is not our policy to comment on nat
by Dove 13y ago
I don't think so. Those usually sound like,
"We cannot confirm or deny the existence of such a program,"
or
"It is not our policy to comment on national security topics"
or
"No comment."
or even
"We'll wait for the results of the investigation."
I don't think the government generally asks civilians to lie so enthusiastically, because . . . well, as a rule, they just aren't good at it.
No, I think it's most likely that Page doesn't know of any such program. Now, it's always possible that such a thing is being carried out on the scale everyone fears by a rogue, loyal-to-the-NSA employee, or a group of them. Or it's possible the original Powerpoint slide including Google as an information source is oversimplified or even inaccurate. Such things do happen when presenting overviews of program capabilities.
And many other things in between are possible. It's concerning, but . . . I'll wait for the results of the investigation. ;)
- mullingitover 13y agoIt's also possible that Larry is concerned about his share price, and what would happen to it if Google was revealed to be completely in bed with the NSA (My guess is it would fall quite a bit). He has real money at stake in limiting the damage that comes from this revelation.
- Avenger42 13y agoThe fallout in such a case has to be smaller than it would be if it comes out later that, not only were they in bed with the NSA, they (and the other companies in this situation) blatantly lied about it with their statements today.