3 ms·

Fine, you have a fair bit of experience, though I'm frankly still not seeing architectural experience in there. You're just wrong. I can live with that explanat

Fine, you have a fair bit of experience, though I'm frankly still not seeing architectural experience in there. You're just wrong. I can live with that explanation. And I'd be happy to shoot down your ideas, if you had any. All you have is your regular content-free rant against IPv6 that you constantly re-post. > Half this site seems to think I'm a secret government agent. No, we just think you're a strict authoritarian who gives the American left a bad name.

tptacek 13y ago
Stop playing dumb. You can't simultaneously complain about my older posts and then refuse to address the points they made. Here are two of them: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5587264 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5587264 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3408523 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3408523 All you've said so far is "Boo! New ideas bad!"
- nknighthb 13y ago
  First of all, I've never even seen the second of those two threads. Shocking as it may be to your ego, not everyone follows each and every one of your myriad utterances on HN. But neither thread is one of substance, only complaints and a vague "we need a general overlay network". Not one word about what it should look like. How it should work. Nothing. If you want to argue about an idea, articulate one. Edit: I see in the second thread you actually did say something about a directory service, so I guess that is one word. But as far as I can tell, you just described yet-another-DNS-replacement. If I were generous, maybe I would call it an Active Directory competitor.
  - tptacek 13y ago
    I like the guy who complains that I bring up the same idea on every IPv6 thread, then acts shocked when I suggest maybe he's read one of those posts. Boo! You continue to say. New ideas bad! How dare you, of all people, assault the old ideas!
    - nknighthb 13y ago
      Are you going to articulate an idea, or just be your usual self? Edit: Ah, you've edited it to clarify. You're just going to be your usual self. How disappointing. Broadly speaking, you're an interesting, intelligent person I would love to know better and to learn from. But you can't stop yourself from being the get-off-my-lawn guy.

tptacek 13y ago

Stop playing dumb. You can't simultaneously complain about my older posts and then refuse to address the points they made. Here are two of them: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5587264 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5587264 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3408523 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3408523 All you've said so far is "Boo! New ideas bad!"

nknighthb 13y ago
First of all, I've never even seen the second of those two threads. Shocking as it may be to your ego, not everyone follows each and every one of your myriad utterances on HN. But neither thread is one of substance, only complaints and a vague "we need a general overlay network". Not one word about what it should look like. How it should work. Nothing. If you want to argue about an idea, articulate one. Edit: I see in the second thread you actually did say something about a directory service, so I guess that is one word. But as far as I can tell, you just described yet-another-DNS-replacement. If I were generous, maybe I would call it an Active Directory competitor.
- tptacek 13y ago
  I like the guy who complains that I bring up the same idea on every IPv6 thread, then acts shocked when I suggest maybe he's read one of those posts. Boo! You continue to say. New ideas bad! How dare you, of all people, assault the old ideas!
  - nknighthb 13y ago
    Are you going to articulate an idea, or just be your usual self? Edit: Ah, you've edited it to clarify. You're just going to be your usual self. How disappointing. Broadly speaking, you're an interesting, intelligent person I would love to know better and to learn from. But you can't stop yourself from being the get-off-my-lawn guy.