I don't agree at all with deletionist philosophy. I want that ended myself. But the arguments typically center around the mission of Wikipedia. If the organiza

I don't agree at all with deletionist philosophy. I want that ended myself. But the arguments typically center around the mission of Wikipedia. If the organization has to fund storage, bandwidth, etc, then they'd like it to be worthwhile content . In other words, people argue that it's simply not Wikipedia's mission or charter to document every trivial fact. It's meant to be a reference for "important" and "notable" things. To reiterate, I don't agree with this. I would actually donate more than I already do to Wikipedia if they changed their policy and were less deletionist. I would like to see more "underground" topics covered on Wikipedia that they delete quickly.