4 ms·
> I still get nuclear physics in "Nuclear Physics" article, amn't I? Not at the same level of quality, because they also won't be deleting the nonsense crank p
by derleth 13y ago
> I still get nuclear physics in "Nuclear Physics" article, amn't I?
Not at the same level of quality, because they also won't be deleting the nonsense crank pseudo-science version of "Nuclear Physics" which would confuse you terribly. Deleting crap is one of the best ways to make the project as a whole useful.
- guard-of-terra 13y agoWell, I won't read that version, I'll only read the "real" one. Bonus points: journalists and common folk will stop pretending everything in wikipedia is true like they do now.
- derleth 13y ago> Well, I won't read that version, I'll only read the "real" one. You won't know which is which unless you already know enough to not need to look it up in a general reference such as Wikipedia. That's the point.