4 ms·
Our people are prominently mentioned in our press releases. We respond on our forums, on twitter, on forums like this. The reason for the lack of a "management
by sridharvembu 13y ago
Our people are prominently mentioned in our press releases. We respond on our forums, on twitter, on forums like this. The reason for the lack of a "management team" page is that we don't the org chart typical companies do. First, there are geographic divisions - India/US/China/Japan where we have offices which run fairly autonomously, and second there are product divisions, which also run fairly autonomously. A private company can operate this way (with a fair degree of autonomy in teams) that a public company cannot.
I have made presentations on the history of the company before. Here is a public document on this:
https://docs.zoho.com/show/published.do?rid=s0uyx6d6a7e9c859c420f8666ec057db3a922 https://docs.zoho.com/show/published.do?rid=s0uyx6d6a7e9c859...
It isn't like we are famous or anything ;) which was why we don't go around touting it!
- clicks 13y ago> The reason for the lack of a "management team" page is that we don't the org chart typical companies do. Would you say Zoho abides by open allocation for its workers? [1] I'd love to hear more about the organizational structure of the company. [1]: http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2012/11/26/what-is-open-allocation/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2012/11/26/what-is-open-al...
- sridharvembu 13y agoWe believe in fair degree of autonomy and tight-knit teams. I won't call it "open allocation" because we encourage people to stick to a particular work for a reasonable period to really excel at it (experience being the best teacher), but people do have the ability to transfer to other teams, or even across functional boundaries (engineering to marketing etc). The goal is to maximize mutual chemistry and cohesion, maximize autonomy. Our attrition rate tends to be very low, in spite of (or perhaps because of) there being no "golden handcuff".