What a bad article. Instead of discussing the big ideas in depth it first starts with a caricature of what is referred to as a "C-hacker"...then delves into an

What a bad article. Instead of discussing the big ideas in depth it first starts with a caricature of what is referred to as a "C-hacker"...then delves into an logical analysis of Linus' sentence structure including the implication of his use of a comma. It looks and feels exactly like the kind of defensive article you would expect from a insecure C++ programmer. Maybe he should have just tweeted "Everything Linus said is wrong! WRONG!" instead.