4 ms·
> Either the interns are there to learn (In which case, they should not be working on anything that provides the employer with value) I feel pretty strongly ab
by doktrin 13y ago
> Either the interns are there to learn (In which case, they should not be working on anything that provides the employer with value)
I feel pretty strongly about the exploitation of free labor, but I'm not sure I agree with this point. Tasks from which a potential intern may learn the most are quite likely to be tasks which create value for the employer.
I'm not even sure what work an intern could possibly do that did not generate value for a team, other than literally digging a ditch and re-filling it.
> If your business can't afford to pay its employees, you should probably not be in business.
Money isn't the only way to pay employees. A learning experience can be just as valuable (if not more so) than some financial compensation. This is highly situational, and can easily be used as justification to get cheap unpaid labor, but nonetheless remains true.
- gyardley 13y agoTasks from which a potential intern may learn the most are quite likely to be tasks which create value for the employer. Sounds plausible to me, along with your point about learning experience, but the comment you're responding to is just reflecting American federal labor law. According to the feds, paid internships can only be for the benefit of the intern, not the employer - if you're gaining from it, you're breaking the law.
- doktrin 13y agoFair point. I wasn't aware of this, and have since read the relevant DOL fact sheet [1]. [1] http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs71.htm http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs71.htm