3 ms·
Indeed, and had the permission been on the extension itself rather than a dependency and there been explanation of why it requires the permission when other res
by talkingquickly 13y ago
Indeed, and had the permission been on the extension itself rather than a dependency and there been explanation of why it requires the permission when other rest clients dont, I'd probably have given it a go.
I'd be really interested to hear more about why the dependency is there and what the interplay between the two extensions and the cloud bit of the service is?
- passfree 13y agoFair point. I will make sure that there is an explanation/mention about this. It is worth mentioning though that the link points to a hosted app - not an extension. You do require an extension for this to work but it is very lightweight and rather simple. The extension only provides the ability to send HTTP requests as you see them.