4 ms·
Why? If they define an article "A blog of John Ass", I just won't read it and my experience would not degrade. I still get nuclear physics in "Nuclear Physics"
by guard-of-terra 13y ago
Why? If they define an article "A blog of John Ass", I just won't read it and my experience would not degrade.
I still get nuclear physics in "Nuclear Physics" article, amn't I?
I can't see how having more articles will make things worse.
- derleth 13y ago> I still get nuclear physics in "Nuclear Physics" article, amn't I? Not at the same level of quality, because they also won't be deleting the nonsense crank pseudo-science version of "Nuclear Physics" which would confuse you terribly. Deleting crap is one of the best ways to make the project as a whole useful.
- guard-of-terra 13y agoWell, I won't read that version, I'll only read the "real" one. Bonus points: journalists and common folk will stop pretending everything in wikipedia is true like they do now.
- derleth 13y ago> Well, I won't read that version, I'll only read the "real" one. You won't know which is which unless you already know enough to not need to look it up in a general reference such as Wikipedia. That's the point.