> and while we're at it, how about doing away with the vitriol even when you don't like someone or their opinion Fair enough. Sorry for the way I wrote what I

> and while we're at it, how about doing away with the vitriol even when you don't like someone or their opinion Fair enough. Sorry for the way I wrote what I wrote. What I was trying to convey is that calling the article out for being misleading, because we can't yet know, goes against what the stated research determined. Admonishing commenters for cheering on nuclear power just because you don't think the research is complete seems suspect. I don't think anyone is saying "but there was no damage done, yay for a perfect energy source". What they're saying is "it's the best we've got and scare campaigns against nuclear power are ridiculous - thankfully someone has exposed them". What happened was terrible. But tearing down the nuclear power plants across the globe is not the correct reaction.