3 ms·
The rather (in)famous academic source for some of this is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controv
by anatoly 13y ago
The rather (in)famous academic source for some of this is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
A later paper that provides a list of statistical complaints against Rind et al., finds some of them plausible, but replicates the main findings of Rind et al. is
http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/rbt_replica/frame.htm http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/rbt_replica/frame.htm
- gizmo686 13y ago> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy That is probably the most disturbing thing I ever read. State and Federal legislatures unanimously condemned the study because it was used by a group they disagree with. I knew we were bad, but ... unanimously?