Just because I know the gap is explainable through cultural differences doesn't mean that I implied I understood why there is no phylogenetic divergence with re

Just because I know the gap is explainable through cultural differences doesn't mean that I implied I understood why there is no phylogenetic divergence with respect to genes for mathematical reasoning. Here is your argument genetics/evolution => In this world, there is some sexual behavioral dimorphism. && 2009 sat => In America, there is a specific type of sexual behavioral dimorphism. Here is my argument math tests => female performance at mathematics varies culturally => genetics does not determine everything and we have to take environment into account And let me be absolutely clear that I am not suggesting that mathematical ability is not heritable. See this study for evidence that it is indeed: [1] www.atypon-link.com/AAP/doi/pdf/10.1375/twin.8.6.585 P.S. I believe religion is a social phenomenon that makes much sense (as to why it exists, and, as you probably care, why it came into existence!) with a valid psychological perspective. And I am willing to elaborate on my logic if you are curious.