28 ms·
In practice the law is interpreted though. Not just for CP! When an analyst looks through some images they have to make a subjective judgement because it is ve
by ErrantX 13y ago
In practice the law is interpreted though. Not just for CP!
When an analyst looks through some images they have to make a subjective judgement because it is very hard to judge age in many cases.
To be clear; striking a suggestive pose is very very rarely illegal in itself. It may be classified on a relevant scale as part of the investigation (e.g. COPINE) but that is only because it is of obvious relevance to the charge/conviction.
If someone was caught with "suggestive" images on their computer in the UK, for example, the CPS wouldn't prosecute (because it's not actually illegal).
- pessimizer 13y agoIn practice (at least in the US), people have been prosecuted for images that were clearly of adults dressed as children, and images that were drawings of children. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#Cases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornog... And though it was struck down in 2002: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Pornography_Prevention_Act_of_1996 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Pornography_Prevention_A... In the UK, Operation Ore resulted in the arrests of 3,744 people, of which very few had any tangible evidence of having, ever purchasing, or accessing child pornography. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ore