So now you're falling back on "interests" of the states when the actions of the Federal government are the ones we have on hard record. I could just as easily

So now you're falling back on "interests" of the states when the actions of the Federal government are the ones we have on hard record. I could just as easily counter Rayiner's contention that the Feds were responsible for ending Segregation by saying that the interests of the states, localities, and citizenry were the actual force behind the end of Segregation.